NCAAs

Started by wrastle63, January 18, 2017, 12:13:05 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

badgerjohn

Quote from: Harris on January 20, 2017, 06:48:34 PM
Quote from: npope on January 20, 2017, 04:55:39 PM
Quote from: dad 2 5 on January 20, 2017, 11:27:06 AM
with that is mind and if the info I gather is correct:
JJ     6-4
ES    12-12
CM   15-8
AC   21-7
TjR   5-3
IJ    16-1
RC  16-10
HR  14-9 
RR  20-10
CM 16-0

with PSU; Iowa; Purdue; MI; MSU; CMU to go. The guys need some quality wins to move up and get some good seeding

No one with a losing record in the lineup is a bit unusual.

No one with a losing record in the lineup is a bit cool  8)

only because coaches are holding guys out to protect seeds    ::)
"Common sense rarely survives an encounter with lawyers."  DrSnide 12/28/11

wrastle63

#46
Quote from: badgerjohn on January 21, 2017, 12:12:23 PM
Quote from: Harris on January 20, 2017, 06:48:34 PM
Quote from: npope on January 20, 2017, 04:55:39 PM
Quote from: dad 2 5 on January 20, 2017, 11:27:06 AM
with that is mind and if the info I gather is correct:
JJ     6-4
ES    12-12
CM   15-8
AC   21-7
TjR   5-3
IJ    16-1
RC  16-10
HR  14-9  
RR  20-10
CM 16-0

with PSU; Iowa; Purdue; MI; MSU; CMU to go. The guys need some quality wins to move up and get some good seeding

No one with a losing record in the lineup is a bit unusual.

No one with a losing record in the lineup is a bit cool  8)

only because coaches are holding guys out to protect seeds    ::)
Foolish. There are 3 guys who are remotely close to 500. JJ hasn't missed a match since coming back. Stickley was dinged up and missed 1. Ruschell has missed 1 even if he loses he's still above.

Ghetto

I think that rolly eye thing means sarcasm.
As long as we are keeping score, I've got something to prove