Wisconsin Wrestling Online

General Discussions => OFF TOPIC-Non Wrestling Discussions-OFF TOPIC => FOOTBALL => Topic started by: Houndhead on September 07, 2021, 01:53:50 PM

Title: Packers
Post by: Houndhead on September 07, 2021, 01:53:50 PM
17-0 baby!!!
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: TomM on September 07, 2021, 03:53:14 PM
YES!!!
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: Houndhead on November 18, 2021, 07:16:31 AM
15-2?
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: TomM on November 18, 2021, 03:12:18 PM
YES 15-2 Baby!!!
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: Houndhead on November 19, 2021, 07:05:56 AM
It's been pretty quiet on here, GPG
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: neutral on November 29, 2021, 06:28:13 PM
12-4?
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: TomM on November 30, 2021, 11:09:08 AM
Quote from: neutral on November 29, 2021, 06:28:13 PM
12-4?
NOOOOOOO!

14-3 Baby!!!
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: Ghetto on December 01, 2021, 02:41:38 PM
anchor.fm/avgcheese (http://anchor.fm/avgcheese)

bit.ly/avgcheesespotify (http://bit.ly/avgcheesespotify)
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: Houndhead on December 02, 2021, 07:21:57 AM
Quote from: TomM on November 30, 2021, 11:09:08 AM
Quote from: neutral on November 29, 2021, 06:28:13 PM
12-4?
NOOOOOOO!

14-3 Baby!!!

Yes, I can see the Packers winning out. This is a very good team. If LaFluer loses one more game, he should be fired. He has never lost more than 3 games. Obviously the whole program is going down hill if they go 13-4.
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: TomM on December 02, 2021, 09:47:38 AM
Quote from: Ghetto on December 01, 2021, 02:41:38 PM
anchor.fm/avgcheese (http://anchor.fm/avgcheese)

bit.ly/avgcheesespotify (http://bit.ly/avgcheesespotify)

Great!
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: neutral on December 26, 2021, 09:35:03 PM
How does everybody feel about McCarthy & his Cowboys coming to Lambeau for the NFC Championship game?
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: Houndhead on January 03, 2022, 07:43:48 AM
Quote from: neutral on December 26, 2021, 09:35:03 PM
How does everybody feel about McCarthy & his Cowboys coming to Lambeau for the NFC Championship game?

If both teams make it that far.
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: Ghetto on January 03, 2022, 07:22:11 PM
Quote from: neutral on December 26, 2021, 09:35:03 PM
How does everybody feel about McCarthy & his Cowboys coming to Lambeau for the NFC Championship game?

Hope to see it. Rodgers will pick them apart. Love that matchup.
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: maggie on January 17, 2022, 11:12:36 AM
pack by 9  :)
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: neutral on January 30, 2022, 10:31:32 AM
Seems kinda like a "dogs and cats living together" reference from Ghostbuster ...
Hackett to Denver ...
(Rodgers to Denver?) ...
Getsy to Chicago ...
(Harbaugh to MN?)
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: neutral on February 02, 2022, 02:30:35 PM
... & Outten - to Denver as OC
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: Ghetto on February 02, 2022, 02:59:31 PM
Took forever to fire Mo Drayton.
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: neutral on February 09, 2022, 12:42:22 PM
Surprised not to find any discussion of ...
staff changes
roster changes ... other than (possibly) Rodgers
Rodgers
possible free agent losses and targets
draft targets

?
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: TomM on February 09, 2022, 01:25:53 PM
Let's see...

"staff changes" -
I think the changes are good. It is a good idea to get new ideas/fresh eyes from outside.
"roster changes .. other than (possibly) Rodgers" -
With or without Rodgers it is a pretty good lineup. It will survive well without the guys who were out most of the season as well. I won't miss Crosby if this past year is his top end performance.
"Rodgers" -
I am with Charles Woodson on this as he was quoted:
"If I'm the Packers, I'm thinking about trading Aaron Rodgers if we can," Woodson said on NFL Network.
"possible free agent losses and targets" -
Rodgers is under contract. The Packers can 'franchise' Adams. They can probably resign most of the other FA's if they want them back.
"draft targets" -
I don't follow the 'who's, who'. I would see them drafting a receiver, an offensive lineman and maybe even a quarterback.

That is my two cents.
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: neutral on February 10, 2022, 09:01:34 AM
 ... and worth every cent of it! (lol)
... "the Kool-aide is strong with this one"/yoda (or OB1)
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: littleguy301 on February 10, 2022, 11:22:03 AM
I am on the trade Karen rodgers boat. Get what we can for him now. The packers are a way better team now than before Lafleur took over. Sure the pack would slip next year but I still think they would be competitive in the NFL north.

What would be fun is a sign and trade thing for Adam's. Notnsure if they can do such things in the NFL but I am on boast for that. With trading both the packers could certainly gather some serious draft picks to really start a rebuild or a recharge! Sure their is some cap issues to deal with but with that amount of draft picks they are bound to find some good replacements!

Trade Karen and Adam's and make out like the cowboys in the walker trade ;D ok maybe dreaming but still.....
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: Ghetto on February 10, 2022, 11:30:08 AM
Your favorite Packer podcast will release an episode with a cap guru who will lay the options out there and how they would effect the Packers long term.

It'll be available for your morning drive.
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: littleguy301 on February 10, 2022, 11:37:53 AM
Gosh I just read that if the packers trade both Karen and Adam's they would have 6 picks in the first 2 rounds and seven of the top 92. Plus I believe 4 in the first 2 rounds in 2023. 10 picks in the first 2 rounds the next 2 years.......holy grape fruits that is incredible to say the least!

That sounds like a better than rebuilding it sounds like reloading to me!

Karen hasn't won a meaningful playoff game since 2010. He is an all time great but really..time to try another route plus alot less drama to deal with! Side note itnhas been 2008 that a team has won the super bowl with the highest paid wr in the league so that confirms trade Adam's!
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: neutral on February 10, 2022, 01:14:31 PM
I think they should trade Rodgers ... and bring back anybody else they can - then bring in competent FA QB ... in case Love is not the answer there ... (and draft another one for the heck of it)
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: Ghetto on February 10, 2022, 08:48:46 PM
Quote from: littleguy301 on February 10, 2022, 11:37:53 AM
Gosh I just read that if the packers trade both Karen and Adam's they would have 6 picks in the first 2 rounds and seven of the top 92. Plus I believe 4 in the first 2 rounds in 2023. 10 picks in the first 2 rounds the next 2 years.......holy grape fruits that is incredible to say the least!

That sounds like a better than rebuilding it sounds like reloading to me!

Karen hasn't won a meaningful playoff game since 2010. He is an all time great but really..time to try another route plus alot less drama to deal with! Side note itnhas been 2008 that a team has won the super bowl with the highest paid wr in the league so that confirms trade Adam's!

We dive into all this and more in Episode 75 of the AVG Cheese with Ken Ingalls. It'll be on your favorite places to get a podcast. Or, click on the AVG Cheese logo on the front page of wiwrestling.com

Title: Re: Packers
Post by: neutral on February 11, 2022, 01:57:44 PM
Great might be interesting ... and possibly informative - but why not contribute to a discussion here?
Not everybody likes podcasts ... they're not interactive.
The goal here is not to get the answers from self-appointed experts - but, rather, to stimulate discussion of opinions among fans.
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: Ghetto on February 11, 2022, 04:03:31 PM
anchor.fm/avgcheese (http://anchor.fm/avgcheese)

Bit.ly/avgcheesespotufy (http://bit.ly/avgcheesespotufy)

Please give it a shot. You CAN ask questions. Send me an email and I'll answer on an episode.

Title: Re: Packers
Post by: Ghetto on February 11, 2022, 04:52:40 PM
That said, Rodgers cannot be traded until after the league year starts on March 16. His cap hit is 46.4 million and will not come off the books if he is traded until after March 16. Adams is all but gone. If they franchise tag him, they have to find another 20.1 million on top of the 50 million they are over the cap.
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: neutral on February 12, 2022, 07:47:38 AM
Maybe I will - but any questions would come through here ... to, hopefully, stimulate a broadened discussion here.

Thanks for your comment/contribution.
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: littleguy301 on March 06, 2022, 11:05:40 AM
I still say trade Karen and Adams. Just think of all the picks the packers could gather with those 2.

Let's face it Karen hasn't won a ,meaningful playoff game since 2010 and age and the last time a team was in the super bowl with the highest paid WR was 2008. The packers are a way better team this up coming year than when lefluer took over 3 plus years ago. Love or we can find a qb with the amount of picks or players we get for those 2.

Sometimes you have to make tough decisions that are not popular but life goes on.
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: littleguy301 on March 08, 2022, 09:04:54 AM
Trade both!
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: hammer on March 09, 2022, 12:08:46 AM
Quote from: littleguy301 on March 06, 2022, 11:05:40 AM
I still say trade Karen and Adams. Just think of all the picks the packers could gather with those 2.

Let's face it Karen hasn't won a ,meaningful playoff game since 2010 and age and the last time a team was in the super bowl with the highest paid WR was 2008. The packers are a way better team this up coming year than when lefluer took over 3 plus years ago. Love or we can find a qb with the amount of picks or players we get for those 2.

Sometimes you have to make tough decisions that are not popular but life goes on.

Holy cow! Didnt think of that until I read it and saw it. Being a fan of another team and what seems like every year Rodgers just roasts my team, I didnt realize that. Since he seems to win the division about every year, you kind of forget he hasn't reached the super bowl since 2010. Looks like the Broncos are off the board with the looks like Russel Wilson trade. To be honest I hope the Packers do trade Rodgers and Adam's, after the what seems like decades of Farve and Rodgers there is no way they hit on Love being 15 year starter, it just cannt happen.
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: Ghetto on March 09, 2022, 06:53:08 PM
Adams isn't under contract. They'd have to sign him to trade him.

Rodgers is coming back, like it or not. Love will be traded before March 16th.

All playoff games are meaningful.


bit.ly/avgcheesespotify (http://bit.ly/avgcheesespotify)
anchor.fm/avgcheese (http://anchor.fm/avgcheese)
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: neutral on March 10, 2022, 08:14:03 AM
Quote from: Ghetto on March 09, 2022, 06:53:08 PM
Adams isn't under contract. They'd have to sign him to trade him.

Rodgers is coming back, like it or not. Love will be traded before March 16th.

All playoff games are meaningful.

-------------------------------------

Not sure about that.  Love doesn't have to be the heir apparent to be the best & least expensive back-up available to the Packers.  I'm also not sure what makes people think he would be worth much in a trade ... just because he has been a back-up on the Packers?  I'd be surprised if it was more than a high 2nd rounder.  They're better off keeping him.
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: littleguy301 on March 10, 2022, 11:23:38 AM
I think love will be gone also. Drafting a qb and sitting him for 5 years isnt sending out the best message to future draft picks and QB either. I am sure love wants to play and prove it like any other competitor. I would guess his agent will be asking for a trade due to that his his job to get his client on the field and in 3 more years he will be pretty worthless for anything money wise around the league.

With this years draft stock of qb, loves value isnt bad as in a trade. He has had 1 start and some time on the field so much more proven than a college kid plus I read he is younger than 1 or 2 of the top qb in the draft.

I can see the Packers getting a high second for Love but may have to package a mid rounder and Love to do so. If the Packers have committed to Karen for 3 to 4 years then trade Love to give him a chance and look with Karen's blessing to draft one maybe next year. I just dont wish Love to go to another team and blossom into a good NFL starter and when Karen is done not to have another super bowl and leave the fans wishing/wanting ;)
Title: Re: Packers
Post by: Ghetto on March 10, 2022, 11:56:28 AM
Quote from: neutral on March 10, 2022, 08:14:03 AM
Quote from: Ghetto on March 09, 2022, 06:53:08 PM
Adams isn't under contract. They'd have to sign him to trade him.

Rodgers is coming back, like it or not. Love will be traded before March 16th.

All playoff games are meaningful.

-------------------------------------

Not sure about that.  Love doesn't have to be the heir apparent to be the best & least expensive back-up available to the Packers.  I'm also not sure what makes people think he would be worth much in a trade ... just because he has been a back-up on the Packers?  I'd be surprised if it was more than a high 2nd rounder.  They're better off keeping him.

There are teams that think he has value. You heard it here first. He'll be traded for a 4th round pick. I'll say the Colts. With the weak class of QBs in this draft, Love would be a first or second round pick for sure.

If you are Jordan Love or his agent, do you want to stay and do nothing and never get your shot? He's 23 years old. If he'd have stayed throughout a redshirt year, he'd be coming out this year.