Aaron Rodgers done for year?

[TomM]

Do you think the Packers are holding Rogers out because Flynn is better?

[imnofish]

Only if they are totally out of touch with reality.   

[easytopin]

Well no more excuses.....PLAY

[Todd]

Chris Mortenson was saying the Packers have the most conservative medical staff in the league. They aren't going to risk the best player on the team for a playoff hope that might not happen even if they win out.

Smart!   

Soft

Stupid.

[whatever]

Chris Mortenson was saying the Packers have the most conservative medical staff in the league. They aren't going to risk the best player on the team for a playoff hope that might not happen even if they win out.

Smart!  

Soft

Stupid.

Very

[Houndhead]

Chris Mortenson was saying the Packers have the most conservative medical staff in the league. They aren't going to risk the best player on the team for a playoff hope that might not happen even if they win out.

Smart!  

Soft

Stupid.

Very

+1

[imnofish]

Chris Mortenson was saying the Packers have the most conservative medical staff in the league. They aren't going to risk the best player on the team for a playoff hope that might not happen even if they win out.

Smart!  

Soft

Stupid.

Very

Time will tell...

[whatever]

At the expense of speaking for others,Todd, myself and Houndhead all were commenting on the poster's comment that Rodgers was soft......not the decision by the Packers to sit Rodgers.

[imnofish]

At the expense of speaking for others,Todd, myself and Houndhead all were commenting on the poster's comment that Rodgers was soft......not the decision by the Packers to sit Rodgers.

Thanks for clarifying.  It can sometimes get hard to follow along.  Either way, I believe that the long-term benefits of doing so will outweigh any short-term gains from playing him prematurely.  Sounds like most of us agree on that.   

[Todd]

At the expense of speaking for others,Todd, myself and Houndhead all were commenting on the poster's comment that Rodgers was soft......not the decision by the Packers to sit Rodgers.

+1 I wondered how many people wouldn't understand that.

hopefully the right person got it.

[Houndhead]

At the expense of speaking for others,Todd, myself and Houndhead all were commenting on the poster's comment that Rodgers was soft......not the decision by the Packers to sit Rodgers.

+1

Doctors orders.

[maggie]

BOTTON LINE, PACKERS WOULD BE NUTS TO START HIM THIS WEEK EVEN IF THE DOC OK'ED IT...UNTIL WE NEED HIM, HE SHOULD SIT!  what we do need is COBB! he's the difference make we need right now...

[easytopin]

Question is ...is it Rodgers, doctors, or Packers organization keeping him out.  ESPN had their "expert doctor" on radio today wondering what is taking so long for the injury to heal (if it is indeed a non-displaced fracture). His basic idea was with this "type" of injury 4-5 weeks should be the normal recovery time.

[Houndhead]

BOTTON LINE, PACKERS WOULD BE NUTS TO START HIM THIS WEEK EVEN IF THE DOC OK'ED IT...UNTIL WE NEED HIM, HE SHOULD SIT!  what we do need is COBB! he's the difference make we need right now...

Cobb won't be playing Sunday.

[bigoil]

BOTTON LINE, PACKERS WOULD BE NUTS TO START HIM THIS WEEK EVEN IF THE DOC OK'ED IT...UNTIL WE NEED HIM, HE SHOULD SIT!  what we do need is COBB! he's the difference make we need right now...

Cobb won't be playing Sunday.

You sure on that?