Packers as of late...

Started by TomM, October 20, 2019, 03:34:32 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

TomM

Quote from: TomM on October 15, 2019, 04:32:19 PM
Stop it Ghetto ...
1) Those receivers are just fine. improving all the time. (maybe more passes could be thrown to them 'in stride' and 'not behind' them regularly..)..
2) The calls have always been like this. Your TV just has better resolution than in the past. I propose getting rid of instant replay.

There you go, now get rid of field goals in the last two minutes of the games and eliminate punting as an alternative and the game would be just fine.

And I should know, I have over 15 years experience coahing 'JV', freshman and freshman 'B team' football.

Quote from: TomM on October 15, 2019, 10:14:01 PM
Quote from: Ghetto on October 15, 2019, 10:02:26 PM
The WR aren't fine.
Rodgers makes them marginal at best.
This is a good team. If they want to win it all, they are going to need a decent option after Adams.
Wait! What?
You questioning a guy with my deep football coaching pedigree? Sheesh...
They are going to have to take some of the air out of the ball (ala Patriots) so the GBP receivers can catch it behind their back like a jugler.
Adams will be back.
Graham is a slow starter.
Kumerow responds when they target him.

Now get a hold of yourself Ghetto...  8)
Seek excellence and truth instead of fame -John Prime
Courage is grace under pressure - Ernest Hemingway
Advocating "matside weigh-in" since 1997
"That's why they wrestle the matches"

Ghetto

Still wish Graham would slowly walk out of Green Bay.
As long as we are keeping score, I've got something to prove

bigG

He has been a let down by my hopes. Just inconsistent. Love how our lesser names have been stepping up. Our DBs still worry me many times.
If I agreed with you we'd both be wrong.

Ghetto

Not having Savage is a problem, but the Packers didn't have an issue with the bad WR that the Raiders have.
As long as we are keeping score, I've got something to prove

bigG

Quote from: Ghetto on October 21, 2019, 04:14:21 PM
Not having Savage is a problem, but the Packers didn't have an issue with the bad WR that the Raiders have.

True that. Hope they're not considering that nut.
If I agreed with you we'd both be wrong.

TomM

(NOTE: Ghetto and BigG.. not sure you two are talking about the same person...)

Seek excellence and truth instead of fame -John Prime
Courage is grace under pressure - Ernest Hemingway
Advocating "matside weigh-in" since 1997
"That's why they wrestle the matches"

TomM

(stolen quote) ...

"...So glad we didn't trade a 2nd to Atlanta, or a 3rd and a 4th to Denver for a receiver in his 30s. We've got all we need in the building right now...."
Seek excellence and truth instead of fame -John Prime
Courage is grace under pressure - Ernest Hemingway
Advocating "matside weigh-in" since 1997
"That's why they wrestle the matches"

Ghetto

We are not.

Darnell Savage (the Packer safety) being out of the lineup is bad for the Packers. He's already changing the way offenses play as a rookie.
As long as we are keeping score, I've got something to prove

The Last Ride

Quote from: TomM on October 22, 2019, 02:10:49 PM
(stolen quote) ...

"...So glad we didn't trade a 2nd to Atlanta, or a 3rd and a 4th to Denver for a receiver in his 30s. We've got all we need in the building right now...."

I agree with this Tom. I liked the TE Hooper from Atlanta. Not sure what WR Green from Cincinnati has left in is tank.
"Do or do not. There is no try."

– Yoda

Houndhead

Savage practiced yesterday. Good chance he plays Sunday night.

wrestlersdad

If there is any truth to the saying

"Defense wins championships"

I think the Packers have a lot of work to do.....
When opportunity comes, its too late to prepare.

bigG

I think the D has come through when we needed them. I'm pretty happy with most of their efforts. Just wish our depth was better at DB.
If I agreed with you we'd both be wrong.